14th December 2017: The day internet neutrality died
December 04, 2017
on
on

The 14th December 2017 is likely to go down in history as the day internet neutrality was abolished. On this day, the commission of the American FCC will vote on a proposal to lift the Open Internet Order put in place in 2015 by the previous administration.
The FCC Commission is currently staffed by three Republicans and two Democrats so it can be assumed that they will toe the party line and the proposal will be approved. From then on there will be no major political obstacles to hinder its progress, and after passing through the legislative chambers, the ironically titled ‘Restoring Internet Freedom Act’ will then become law next spring. That is unless a federal court blocks the case, but the chances of that happening are pretty slim.
So, what’s at stake? The rules governing net neutrality implemented during the Obama administration are likely to be repealed. These are in place to ensure ISPs treat all internet traffic equally, currently ISPs aren't allowed to impede or slow down lawful Internet traffic and also aren’t allowed to accept any payment in exchange for prioritizing any online service in the link it provides to the home user’s computer or mobile device. The vast majority of comments relating to the existing net neutrality rules introduced in 2015 are broadly in support of the regulations as they stand.
The likely consequences: The internet will become opaque. Big internet companies will have the funds to strike deals with ISPs guaranteeing that their own services and content will be given priority while smaller businesses and startups will face additional hurdles to get their message across. You can also expect increased forms of data surveillance, we have already witnessed, prior to 2015, a major global telecommunications conglomerate being caught using so-called ‘deep packet inspection’ to identify and block certain types of peer-to-peer file transfers in order to favor their own content. It is likely that this new proposal by the FCC will give ISPs the green light to continue these practices.
As well as the title of the bill being ironic, it is also reminiscent of the language used by the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell's 1984: There is talk of ‘liberating’ the Internet and that these new proposals will eliminate ‘unfair’ regulations. ISPs will without doubt enjoy more freedom if net neutrality rules are rescinded. Many of the major ISPs have of course welcomed the proposal but if their past behavior is anything to go by, the proposed changes will really only benefit ISP shareholders at the expense of everyone else who uses the web.
The exact wording of the Restoring Internet Freedom Act can be read in this PDF file.
The FCC Commission is currently staffed by three Republicans and two Democrats so it can be assumed that they will toe the party line and the proposal will be approved. From then on there will be no major political obstacles to hinder its progress, and after passing through the legislative chambers, the ironically titled ‘Restoring Internet Freedom Act’ will then become law next spring. That is unless a federal court blocks the case, but the chances of that happening are pretty slim.
So, what’s at stake? The rules governing net neutrality implemented during the Obama administration are likely to be repealed. These are in place to ensure ISPs treat all internet traffic equally, currently ISPs aren't allowed to impede or slow down lawful Internet traffic and also aren’t allowed to accept any payment in exchange for prioritizing any online service in the link it provides to the home user’s computer or mobile device. The vast majority of comments relating to the existing net neutrality rules introduced in 2015 are broadly in support of the regulations as they stand.
The likely consequences: The internet will become opaque. Big internet companies will have the funds to strike deals with ISPs guaranteeing that their own services and content will be given priority while smaller businesses and startups will face additional hurdles to get their message across. You can also expect increased forms of data surveillance, we have already witnessed, prior to 2015, a major global telecommunications conglomerate being caught using so-called ‘deep packet inspection’ to identify and block certain types of peer-to-peer file transfers in order to favor their own content. It is likely that this new proposal by the FCC will give ISPs the green light to continue these practices.
As well as the title of the bill being ironic, it is also reminiscent of the language used by the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell's 1984: There is talk of ‘liberating’ the Internet and that these new proposals will eliminate ‘unfair’ regulations. ISPs will without doubt enjoy more freedom if net neutrality rules are rescinded. Many of the major ISPs have of course welcomed the proposal but if their past behavior is anything to go by, the proposed changes will really only benefit ISP shareholders at the expense of everyone else who uses the web.
The exact wording of the Restoring Internet Freedom Act can be read in this PDF file.
Read full article
Hide full article
Discussion (17 comments)
n111ckk 7 years ago
I guess that if someone with attrocious or zero internet is offered something by one of the massive players on the basis that you have to use their services, then it'll be a no-brainer for them...
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
Tell us, Tom, what are the net neutrality regs in Germany?
Dr. Thomas Scherer 7 years ago
German rules are very much not really clear but tend to support neutrality. IIt is more a question of European laws than of national laws. But if you are interested:
https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Breitband/Netzneutralitaet/Netzneutralitaet-node.html
or translated via google:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bundesnetzagentur.de%2FDE%2FSachgebiete%2FTelekommunikation%2FUnternehmen_Institutionen%2FBreitband%2FNetzneutralitaet%2FNetzneutralitaet-node.html&edit-text=&act=url
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
"It is silly to think that there are many internets": true, but there are many ISPs and many countries. What would be the effect if some ISPs are neutral while others aren't? Will the neutral ones have a competitive advantage, or will it be a competitive disadvantage? Will net neutral countries attract more internet innovation than non-neutral countries, or will it be more lucrative to make deals with non-neutral ISPs?
And I'm not convinced about your statement "It is silly to think that there are many internets". Tell that to the Chinese. Or the Turks or the Iranians. The internet landscape in China is very different from that in the US. I don't know, but I presume Europe's internet is pretty tightly integrated with the US's. Well, what effect do you think the FCC's decision will have on that? Will Europe end up being limited the same way the US is? Or will the US and Europe split and - just like China and the West - end up with very different internet economies?
Jeez, Thomas, there are SO MANY interesting questions that I would love to see knowledgable people comment on. But all I see is the same old boring "it's the end of the world" articles!
Peter Lovell 7 years ago
And just in case you are wondering I'm white English and not a communist
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
All I will say is that if an article about net neutrality sets you off on a diatribe against the US and Israeli governments, and a defense of Iran's nuclear program, you need to get a life.
RICHARD RUSSELL 7 years ago
My internet speed has gone from 128kb/s ten years ago to 200Mb/s today, and that was without any help from Congress.
Dr. Thomas Scherer 7 years ago
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
There are a zillion articles on the web criticizing the FCC's impending decision. With this article, it's a zillion and one. Why did you write this article, Thomas? Did you have some new piece of information for us? Did you have a new perspective for us? Did you think we didn't already know the FCC was going to do this?
No. All you did was regurgitate what everyone else has been writing.
And it's unfortunate, because you really could've done something different. You could've talked about the rules in Europe. You could've speculated on the effects the FCC's decision will have on the rest of the world. Will American innovation lag? Will innovators relocate to other countries, or will innovators in Europe have an advantage? Will American internet companies find overseas markets more attractive once the US ISPs do all the things you fear they will do? Will they offer services in Europe that they don't offer in the US?
C'mon, Thomas! Say something new and interesting!
Dr. Thomas Scherer 7 years ago
You asked me to speculate about the consequences. Well I can't see the future. We all will see what happens.
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
"You asked me to speculate about the consequences. Well I can't see the future.": And yet your 4th paragraph starts "The likely consequences:".
Dr. Thomas Scherer 7 years ago
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
The speculating you did - all about what ISPs might do - doesn't apply to A SINGLE ISP outside of the US! ISPs outside of the US aren't affected by the FCC's decision! You're in Europe, Thomas, but your speculation applies only to the US and you're silent about what the effect on you, personally, and the bulk of Elektor readers will be. (I'm assuming here that most of Elektor's readers are outside the US.)
That's astounding! How can you be so incurious about the secondary effects this ruling will have on you?
David Best 7 years ago
p.s. If Robert has any writing I'm interested regardless of the topic. He appears to be an organized critical thinker and formally educated.
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
Abu Bakar Siddique 7 years ago
marjoie cricket jackson 7 years ago