Batteroo ReBoost gives a Ni-MH cell a voltage hike
August 03, 2017
on
on

Many electronic devices are designed to operate with primary cells using a nominal voltage of 1.5 V and often do not work well with the slightly lower voltage provided by rechargeable batteries. All that could change by using a Batteroo ReBoost SmartSleeve, which is a thin voltage management and up-converter battery sleeve; it helps save money and protects your devices.
One interesting project on Indiegogo at the moment is the Batteroo ReBoost. The startup is looking for funding to produce SmartSleeves which slip over an ordinary NiMh batteries and provide a voltage boost to deliver 1.5 V to the battery holder terminals. Technical information on the project page is a little skimpy, but idea works by incorporating battery management circuitry (similar to the circuitry included with Li-Ion batteries to prevent deep discharge and regulate the charge cycle) into a sleeve that slips over a standard Ni-MH rechargeable battery. In this case management circuitry does not regulate the recharge cycle so the battery must be removed from the sleeve for charging in a standard charger.
The Batteroo Reboost SmartSleeve circuitry contains a step-up voltage converter, to boost the nominal 1.2 V from the battery to 1.5 V which some pieces of equipment require for correct operation. This means that the equipment will not turn off while there is still a useful amount of charge remaining in the battery, the equipment will function as if it were powered by primary cells. The SmartSleeve’s battery management circuitry effectively disconnects the battery when its output voltage falls below a lower threshold value to protect against deep discharge. Rechargeables work out several hundred times cheaper than primary cells and generate less waste. The SmartSleeve should also protect expensive equipment from the damage caused by electrolyte leakage from neglected alkaline primary cells.
It’s a nice idea, if it works as well as advertised. The lack of information does not inspire trust however. There is no information about the maximum current capability or the unit’s efficiency. For low usage and low-current applications (such as a remote controller or wireless keyboard) it’s questionable whether current consumed by the battery management circuitry will put more of a drain on the battery than the equipment itself. For high current applications heat dissipated in the management circuit may lead to unacceptable increase in temperature. Doubts will inevitably arise when this sort of important information is not published. Maybe the product is still just at the concept stage and not fully developed.
You can back the project for $ 20 minimum, the last time I checked they were well over half way toward the $ 30,000 goal with still a month to go.
One interesting project on Indiegogo at the moment is the Batteroo ReBoost. The startup is looking for funding to produce SmartSleeves which slip over an ordinary NiMh batteries and provide a voltage boost to deliver 1.5 V to the battery holder terminals. Technical information on the project page is a little skimpy, but idea works by incorporating battery management circuitry (similar to the circuitry included with Li-Ion batteries to prevent deep discharge and regulate the charge cycle) into a sleeve that slips over a standard Ni-MH rechargeable battery. In this case management circuitry does not regulate the recharge cycle so the battery must be removed from the sleeve for charging in a standard charger.
The Batteroo Reboost SmartSleeve circuitry contains a step-up voltage converter, to boost the nominal 1.2 V from the battery to 1.5 V which some pieces of equipment require for correct operation. This means that the equipment will not turn off while there is still a useful amount of charge remaining in the battery, the equipment will function as if it were powered by primary cells. The SmartSleeve’s battery management circuitry effectively disconnects the battery when its output voltage falls below a lower threshold value to protect against deep discharge. Rechargeables work out several hundred times cheaper than primary cells and generate less waste. The SmartSleeve should also protect expensive equipment from the damage caused by electrolyte leakage from neglected alkaline primary cells.
It’s a nice idea, if it works as well as advertised. The lack of information does not inspire trust however. There is no information about the maximum current capability or the unit’s efficiency. For low usage and low-current applications (such as a remote controller or wireless keyboard) it’s questionable whether current consumed by the battery management circuitry will put more of a drain on the battery than the equipment itself. For high current applications heat dissipated in the management circuit may lead to unacceptable increase in temperature. Doubts will inevitably arise when this sort of important information is not published. Maybe the product is still just at the concept stage and not fully developed.
You can back the project for $ 20 minimum, the last time I checked they were well over half way toward the $ 30,000 goal with still a month to go.
Read full article
Hide full article
Discussion (15 comments)
Andreas Winter 7 years ago
Dom Jenkins 7 years ago
Here's a link: https://www.eevblog.com/2015/06/07/the-batteriser-explained/
Peter Franking 7 years ago
I hope everyone will read it!!
Thanks Dom for the link!!
oz5es 7 years ago
Thomas Scherer should have very red ears by now.
WHY has this not been removed yet ?
Andreas Winter 7 years ago
DNeves 7 years ago
It seems now they just relabeled it with another name and made a slightly different application of it. At the time I already thought this would be a much better use of the technology if it proves to be efficient enough. I mean a product that simply boosts 1.2V to 1.5V to be used on rechargeables.
Even though this product seems much more realistic and actually could work as intended (if well designed), given lack of technical details and all the history behind it, it leaves me a bit suspicious about it.
ROBERT ALEXANDER 7 years ago
MadMike 7 years ago
Which are less expensive than the NiCad, maybe don't have the same energy storage, but the voltage
is close enought to make them quite useable!
Wrrr 7 years ago
Really?
avaldebe 7 years ago
Stephen 7 years ago
I was a subscriber, from the late 1970s, until the late 1990s. During this time you declined in quality to the point that I ceased my subscription.
You then bought Circuit Cellar, and ruined it. I didn't renew my subscription to that afterwards, either. You messed it up so badly that Steve Ciarcia bought it back from you.
Always open minded, today I decided to revisit your site, with a view to taking out a new subscription, if you had improved. What do I see? A positive write up about a comprehensively debunked product. Not just that, but even encouragement to back it. Do you not have access to any Internet search engines at all? Please just Google 'batteriser eevblog', or even just 'batteriser scam'.
Please, there's so much good stuff in the world of electronics - don't make yourselves look like gullible amateurs.
I am aware that there *could be* a pretty niche application for NiMh terminal voltage boosting, but the provenance of Batteroo merits caution, and your advert, sorry, 'article' applies no critical thinking at all.
Edit - Actually, they are already funded, to the tune of 1317% of their original goal:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/batteroo-extend-battery-life-significantly#/
This is the same product. Why do they need more funding to develop a product that is already finished?
Dr. Thomas Scherer 7 years ago
en, if there would be an argument worth discussing about I would do. I don"t know what horses some people are riding so that they feel the urge to just make other things down to feel betteer. For me your comment is just unjustified.
This is just something to mention what some startups have "invented" and are working on. For me I see the readers as adult and clever enough to make there own judgements and decisions. There is no need to emotionally write something down or up.
Stephen 7 years ago
Thank you for your reply. Here are the comments from the backers of their previous campaign, for your readers to use in their decision making:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/batteroo-extend-battery-life-significantly#/comments
Stephen.
Dr. Thomas Scherer 7 years ago
No, I can see that Indiegogo hast problems with its server. I'll try it later again and add an update to the news
kodi 7 years ago
Name one.
It's 2017, not 1990. Almost all products are designed to work properly with range of cells from 1.2V to 1.6V. This article is as other people mentioned about the iteration of batterizer. If it would be marketed with the proper approach like "step-up" converter from the start that guarantee 1.5V at the output no matter of cell charge - it would be fine. However it would be a niche product. When I heard about the batterizer I checked all my appliances in house that are using AA cells. Not one of them needed primary cell to work. We have 2 kids, so lots of toys. We have ~100 rechargables in use, not one time they caused problem - the only caveat is that some toys will drain them to fraction of the volt, but you can notice it by symptoms like changed pitch of the sound etc.
The problem with this device is not that it is bad - it can be actually useful when you will find an appliance that needs those 1.4-1.5V/cell or (more probable) you want to prevent your rechargeables tfrom going flat. Problem is - as people mentioned before - that the same device was sold promising things that were just impossible to achieve. And a lot of people purchased it... just to be disappointed.